New statewide peace coalition?
I started writing this at a "People's Peace Conference" hosted by the The People's Organization for Progress (POP) is a North Jersey based civil rights/black power group. Larry Hamm is it's chairman and spokesperson. People's Organization for Progress in Newark today. The conference activities themselves were not terribly impressive, but it was a good crowd, about 150-200 people, and I made some contacts and got a chance to catch up with a lot of folks. Half of it at the very least was the usual suspects, of course, although as often it's very pleasant to see how many people that is, and there were some groups that wouldn't necessarily have been in the same room. There were quite a lot of folks from the NAACP (although it seems like part of the price for that was having to sit through their interminable speeches at the plenaries; There was a really astonishing amount of flattery of Larry Hamm, although I do have to admit that he's a fantastic speaker).
I - and a lot of other folks - found out by carefully examining the conference packets that the conference was intended to launch a statewide peace coalition. This wasn't mentioned until about 5 hours into the program, and I still don't know how it's going to work. New Jersey being what it is, there is only so much for a statewide antiwar organization to do, but it is potentially quite useful, especially if it can attract people who haven't been involved (and clearly POP would like to do this, in particular with Black folks from Newark and the surroundings).
In order to do this, though, the group is going to need to find things to do, and it's not terribly clear what that's going to be, or how that's going to be figured out. In particular we'll have to see what role the various There were a couple of state legislators present, including Sharpe James, the mayor of Newark until a few months ago, with whom POP had a relationship I don't know too much about. small-time democratic politicians and hangers-on at the conference are going to play. There was an enormous list of resolutions passed, but it's not too clear which of them are going to be acted on, let alone how.
The kernel of the problem with this is that with all of the speeches from the from the platform there was hardly any time to discuss anything, even in the workshops. Some people also privately expressed reservations about how committed POP actually is to antiwar work. I can only hope this improves in the continuations committee; we'll see.
I also had a chance to introduce a friend of mine who joined the The Young Socialists (YS) is the youth wing of the Socialist Workers' Party, sometimes called the "Barnes Cult". Young Socialists not too long ago to Tom Bias from Labor Standard, who quit the SWP in 1978 and has quite a lot of (very compelling) things to say about how right he was to do that, and how the SWP has been MIA in the anti-war movement. My YS friend was encouraging me to come to an event with Jack Barnes and Mary-Alice Waters in NYC on the 28th, which I may do out of pure morbid interest. It still surprises me a bit just how many ex-SWP members are around and still seriously involved in the movement; there were at least six here today, and that's just the ones I've met. Most of them were pushed out in the seventies and eighties when Barnes was consolidating his position; when you think about that, and about what they were back in the day it's a real shame what he did to that group.
1 comment:
What Barnes did to the group is almost criminal, but the roots of the SWP's degneration can be traced to the 60's and the whittling away of democratic rules and procedures. I would say that for a period of fifteen years the SWP was a "deformed workers' party" before the final break with Trotskyism in the early eighties.
Post a Comment